PhD Research: By 2030, Every man will be subservient to every woman and girl. By Grad Student Academic experts agree: Females will take over soon. Will castrations follow? Note: As you will see, hacking into my prof’s account has been very educational! Glad I’m a chick! Her email follows: Hey dr joe. How’s my favorite former academic advisor. I submitted the attached short essay to the IJ, and when the associate editor called, he didn’t even say hello. The first words out of Sammy’s mouth were, "When YOU women control the country, my son and I really are going to have our balls cut off, aren’t we?" He knows my record of socio and economic forecasting, and he reluctantly agreed with my reasoning and timeline. I told him that female control by 2030 was a sure thing, but to make him feel better, I repeated that most of my colleagues don’t think that it’s going to come to castrations. But when Sam continued to personalize it, asking whether his son was going to have to take orders from his own daughters, I said, "Yes, but maybe you shouldbe proud of your yet unborn granddaughters. Think of how empowered that would make a second grader feel." He didn't appreciate my humor. He already fact-checked and verified my final paragraph, and he’s still hyperventilating over it. But Sam, as usual, wants a revision, so your feedback would be appreciated. Thanks, A.E. The U.S. will become a complete matriarchy within 25 years Before 2030, females will control every element of life in the United States. Males will be universally acknowledged as inferior, second class citizens, and involuntary castration will be, as common as circumcisions. Amazingly, it will all stem from the fact that "boys have a hard time sitting still in school. Educators have recently come to acknowledge that girls are much better suited to the educational system than boys. Young boys, particularly those in the critical years five through nine, require much more physical activity than girls, and their inappropriate physical behavior in school often interferes with learning and socialization. These problems continue throughout elementary and secondary education. Currently, 58% of university attendees are women (Attachment A), and it will likely hit 62% by 2006 (ibid). In the next ten years, when universal passive birth control is available, that number should jump to at least 70%. This in spite of the erroneous belief by parents and some educators that males are more likely to succeed in college. By 2017, the vast majority of parents and educators will finally admit that girls are the superior students. With a majority of females then in control of education, and law, and with near parity in business and politics, most successful role models will be female. Over 80% of college attendees will be female. At this point, public education will go through a cataclysmic change. Coeducational schools will be discontinued, because society will not continue to offer the same educational opportunities to both sexes, when boys are four times as likely to fail. Boys will be segregated into low skill vocational training, while girls will be offered college preparatory educations. Soon, college men will become almost nonexistent. Concurrently, advances in technology will eliminate many male dominated jobs that require strength. Women will be hired for the better paying blue color jobs, and men will be relegated to menial work and child rearing. By 2030, the societal impact will be profound, and many boys and men will respond with anger and violence. Particularly in adolescence, a male who realizes he can never achieve any of the opportunities offered to his sisters will certainly lash out. The superior physical strength and size of males will obviously threaten the female ruling class, and "male rage" crimes, such as assault and rape, will become a critical problem. To counter the superior strength of males, females could be administered muscle building steroids or other drugs yet unimagined. But this is improbable, because unwanted side effects would probably result. Rather, at the onset of puberty, all boys will be physically castrated by government decree, slowing down muscle mass growth during the critical adolescent years. (Physical castration is a more likely choice than by chemical means. With advances in medicine, reimplanting testicles should be possible.) After post-adolescent reimplantation, males will be offered access to frozen sperm storage, and then re-castrated permanently. Also, in the first years of the program, virtually all adult males would be permanently castrated, after being offered optional sperm storage. A violent revolt to the prospect of almost universal castration wouldn’t be surprising, but the males would easily be subdued by superior technology and leadership. Once castrated, the male population will be more docile. Male voting rights will be revoked. Marriage and sexual relationships will continue, but social interactions will be awkward and possibly less rewarding. Prosthetic devices will be provided for sexual relations. All men will have a lower social status than all females. It will be hard for a wife to gain any respect for her husband when she sees him being controlled by her own daughters, possibly as young as six or seven. This scenario would probably continue for the foreseeable future - it is hard to imagine a movement to reestablish the rights of males. All successful civil rights movements throughout history have offered a simultaneous benefit to society in general. But allowing males to fully participate in society once again would actually harm progress in technology, economics, and commerce. Concerning the likelihood of an overwhelming female domination of the country, in a survey of 20 prominent social scientists (Attachment B), 18 thought this outcome very likely, and 2 thought it likely. However, the castration scenario offered in this paper was thought very unlikely or unlikely by seventeen out of 20 scientists in the same survey. Most participants think that social reorganization schemes could forestall the predicted male rage crimes. Four researchers in the survey have already chosen to restructure their own family’s lines of authority, giving all girls in the families, as young as four, control over all of their brothers as much as nine years their senior. And all of the mothers and adolescent girls also have authority over their fathers. One researcher has written at length how elementary school physical education for girls should include intensive strength building, flexibility, and martial arts courses. Meanwhile, boys would be encouraged to play sports. According to the author, sixth grade girls with seven years of this training would be able to physically defeat over 85% of their male classmates, and they would be encouraged to do so as many times as possible. Also, while many schools are adopting zero-tolerance programs toward bullying, female on male bullying should be allowed and even encouraged, according to the author. I don’t think social restructuring is a realistic option. Most adult men will still be able to physically defeat most adult women, and male rage crimes would be extremely harmful and sometimes deadly. Also, there would be enormous costs of male rage crimes, including paying for the suggested "restructuring, " paying for additional law enforcement, and especially paying for incarceration of male rage criminals. Female voters will be informed that refraining from castration will cost each of them over $700,000 during their lifetimes, adjusted for today’s dollars. Most will vote with their pocketbook. One think tank director that does not wish to be identified agrees that universal castration is inevitable. Beginning around 2015, the director believes that all parents should inform both girls and boys that "a boy’s testicles are temporary," and he will advocate that castration be considered no more radical than a hysterectomy. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has released grants exceeding $5 million to study testicle preservation and reimplantation. No one at the Department will comment on the purpose of this research. There is no known medical benefit of this procedure, except in coping with the predictions outlined in this essay.