WRESTLING FEES: A CONTINUATION By Walt Pitt I'm glad to see that my original piece stimulated more than a little conversation on this subject of paid private matches. That's good. It's always healthy to re-examine something once in a while to offset the inevitable complacency people develop about things. Even when something is more or less clearly objectionable, human beings have a tendency to just accept it if it's been in place for a long time. Issues should be examined on their individual merits and not on whether or not they've become accepted as a status quo. Just because private matches have cost a lot for "as long as anyone can remember," doesn't make it right. A very detailed and well-thought-out rebuttal to what I originally wrote was posted on the Valkyrie Session Economics message board. I will not reproduce it here, but I'd like to address the points that it makes. Let me begin by saying that all the women that responded did so to basically say that they agreed with me, and that they adhere to the pricing guidelines I've called for: Jett, Sheila Burgess, Awesome Anne and Miss Janna. All the voices of dissent (not that there've been many) are male, which I find very interesting. Their basic argument (and it's a good one) boils down to, "If you don't like what private wrestling matches cost, quit whining and don't do them." Fair enough. But that dodges my basic premise. Yes, private inter-gender wrestling matches are, shall we say, a "premium service" that has evolved an elite pricing structure. This is obviously due to the fact that of the overall female population, only a very, very small percentage are willing to do this kind of thing; fields such as plumbing or carpentry have many practitioners, and thus their pricing structure is more reasonable. A plumber and a carpenter can be found in every city and town in the U.S., but there are entire states, such as Wyoming, that have nary a female wrestler. The relative rareness of practitioners coupled with the "what the market will bear" principle has spawned the prices that we see today. I did not call for a rollback of these prices, which I know would be essentially impossible and unacceptable to all of women. Rather, I called for them to STOP RAISING their prices, and I suggested a system of common sense discounts which would benefit provider and client alike. Pre-paying of sessions shields wrestlers from no-shows, and for that courtesy, a common sense thank you in the form of a discount could be given by the wrestler. I see nothing unworkable or fanciful in this. Some lame objections were quickly raised on the grounds that using credit cards could be embarrassing for men with a significant other who might question the payment if they saw it on the household's monthly statement. I clearly stated that money orders would be another option. Everyone knows that money orders cannot bounce (they're pre-paid). Another option would be wiring the money to the wrestler via Western Union. This would also leave no paper trail. The author of the rebuttal piece pooh-poohs the idea that price fixing goes on in this business; he argues that since wrestlers are not organized into any sort of union or cartel, it would be impossible. I'd like to inform him that it certainly does go on in New York City with respect to agencies, with the notable exception of JV Productions. Within the space of a couple of months, New York City's wrestling agencies bumped their hour fee up by $50. What they charge isn't posted on their websites. What did they do, read each other's minds, or just serendipitously all decide to hike their price at around the same time? Hogwash. He argues that because some wrestlers travel, this adds another wrinkle or layer of complexity to the issue of what they should charge. It does not. Let's use as an example a wrestler who flies to a location at a cost of $350 roundtrip and stays in a $100 a night hotel, checking in Monday afternoon and checking out Wednesday morning (she'll be charged for 2 nights, $100 x 2 = $200). Factoring in a taxi to and from the airport and meals, the trip will cost her about $650. If she's charging $300 an hour, all she has to book is 2 one hour sessions and she's made up six-sevenths of her expenditures right there. The rest is pure profit that she puts in her pocket. Traveling does not justify charging more. He argues, rightly, that the session business doesn't have ".one big market, but a multitude of little niches." Some men want competitive sessions, some men want sensual sessions; some men want hyper-muscular wrestlers, some want slender ones; some want the woman to totally dominate them, some want to fight back; etc., etc. I must therefore limit the following criticism to only one type of wrestler/session. There are MANY women on the wb270 list that are more accurately described as something other than wrestlers. Some are pure escorts who have as much interest in actually wrestling you as I have in wrestling a grizzly. Others are competitive bodybuilders, who also generally do not like to really wrestle. Others are pure dominatrixes who again, for the most part, leave something to be desired in the grappling skill/desire department. All of this is perfectly fine. I cast no aspersions on any of these types of sessions, and I make no moral judgments of them. BUT MANY OF THESE TYPES OF WOMEN PRETEND TO BE SKILLED WRESTLERS WHEN THEY IN FACT ARE NOT. I'd be ashamed to tell you how many times I've done matches with women who led me to believe one way or another that they were decent competitive wrestlers (the kind of match I enjoy) and they wound up wrestling about as skillfully as 10-year olds. I wrestled a woman from Washington state (now retired, thankfully) whose website said that she was a student at a pro wrestling school and that she was taking instruction in submission style fighting from a professional male NHB fighter. At one point during our "match" (ha, ha) I asked her if she could show me how to do an ankle lock. She looked at me like I'd asked her to flap her arms and fly to the moon. She had no clue what I was talking about. I generally like the way the wb270 site is run and handled, and it's a good resource, but it exacerbates this problem by posting alleged "favorable match reviews" for every wrestler. These "reviews" give the unwary the impression that every single woman listed on the site, including the aforementioned sex kitten who had no clue what an ankle lock was, is a worldbeater. These glowing reviews are probably bogus at least half of the time; the woman can get friends to send them in or do so herself through e- mail accounts other than her own. This practice should cease because there's no way to verify these "reviews". Many, many, many men who partake of this service have been swindled by women who profess to be skilled competitive grapplers but aren't. I therefore question why women in the 3 categories I mentioned above (escorts, non-wrestling bodybuilders and doms) are listed on a site that calls itself a wrestling info site. This is about nothing more than truth in advertising. A site that lists full service escorts wouldn't have pages devoted to Ziggy or Mayra, so why should a wrestling site that lists grapplers have pages devoted to women who want to do nothing more strenuous than flex their biceps in front of you or spank you with a paddle? There should be separate umbrella websites for escorts, non-wrestling bodybuilders, doms, and wrestlers, so there'd be no confusion. I'd like to touch on one final point, that of guys getting shorted on time because some women sandwich sessions so close together. If I pay a wrestler's asking fee, I'm entitled to not one second less than the amount of time I paid for. The phenomenon known as "clock watching" goes hand-in- hand with this. If my session is scheduled for 2:00 pm and I arrive exactly on time, the session cannot end at 3:00 pm without me being cheated. Picture the scene: I enter, there's a few minutes of polite "How are you?" chit-chat, I have to change into whatever I wrestle in, and I might like to go to the bathroom first. THE WRESTLING CLOCK SHOULD START RUNNING WHEN WE ACTUALLY BEGIN TO WRESTLE, NOT WHEN I ENTER THE ROOM! When the wrestling ends, I have to get dressed and there'll be more chit-chat. If I arrive at 2:00 and get shoved out the door to make room for her next client at 3:00, I obviously wasn't wrestling for a full hour; it would be something more along the lines of 45 minutes. This is wrong, and it exemplifies the kind of greed I was talking about in the first piece. I suppose "clock watching" is more akin to stinginess than greed. I've actually had women set a timer to go off at the exact moment that 30 or 60 minutes is up. God forbid she should go a few minutes over for the, perhaps, week's pay I've forked over. I suggest that guys should begin to start sharing information about their bad experiences, in e-mails between each other and in public forums like this one. Telling me who you've wrestled that sucked would be far more useful to me than glowing "accounts of matches" like wb270 and TomNine post. Again, this is a premium service. I accept that. But if I go to a 4-star hotel or restaurant, which also charge premium rates, I'll be treated decently. I have every right to expect the same from a wrestler.